|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Beyond reformAgency `after theory'
John Schlueter
Loyola University Chicago, jschlu1{at}luc.edu
This article assesses the peculiar condition of being `after' theory. Any attempt to better understand why theory now haunts contemporary intellectual practice more than it challenges it must make use of the archive of feminist theory's critical distance with poststructuralism. In fact, feminist theory's traditional concern with the possibilities of/for agency gives us the most useful framework for assessing both the in/adequacy of theory and the in/adequacy of any `after theory' return (whether to aesthetics, intentionality, universalism, liberalism, the literary, etc.). If the question of agency puts pressure on theory's shortcomings, and the continued failure to locate agency within a constructivist framework gives legitimacy to regressive returns, then a more sustained discussion of agency is urgent. In turn, locating agency requires, philosophically and critically, a recuperation of `experience' as a way of knowing. If it can be argued that the constructive process is what occasions experience, and experience, finally, is the site of agency, then we can theorize the `how' of agency without relying on externalized positionalities (which are phenomenologically untenable). Finally, if, politically speaking, the failure to locate agency leaves us oscillating between the avowal and disavowal of reform, then a sustained discussion of agency promises to take us `beyond reform' altogether.
Key Words: agency • constructionism • experience • privilege • the local
References
- Alcoff, Linda (1988) `Cultural Feminism vs. Post-structuralism: The Identity Crisis in Feminist Theory', Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 13(3): 405—36.[CrossRef]
- Anderson, Amanda (2006) The Way We Argue Now: A Study in the Cultures of Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Austin, J.L. (1975) How To Do Things With Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Bordo, Susan (1999) The Male Body. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.
- Brown, Wendy (2002) `Moralism as Antipolitics', in Materializing Democracy. Durham: Duke University Press.
- Butler, Judith (1991) `Imitation and Gender Subordination', pp. 13—31 in Diana Fuss (ed.) Inside/Out: Lesbian Theories, Gay Theories. New York: Routledge.
- Butler, Judith (1992) `Contingent Foundations: Feminism and the Question of Postmodernism', in Judith Butler and Joan Scott (eds) Feminists Theorize the Political. New York: Routledge.
- Butler, Judith (1993) Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of Sex. New York: Routledge.
- Butler, Judith (1997) Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative. New York and London: Routledge.
- Butler, Judith and Joan Scott, eds (1992) Feminists Theorize the Political. New York: Routledge.
- De Lauretis, Teresa (1984) Alice Doesn't. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
- De Lauretis, Teresa (1987) Technologies of Gender: Essays on Theory, Film and Fiction. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
- Eagleton, Terry (2003) After Theory. New York: Basic Books.
- Hacking, Ian (1999) The Social Construction of What? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- McDonald, Peter D. (2006) `Ideas of the Book and Histories of Literature: After Theory?', PMLA 121(1): 214—28.[CrossRef]
- Nicholson, Linda, ed. (1995) Feminist Contentions: A Philosophical Exchange. New York: Routledge.
- Nussbaum, Martha (1999) Sex and Social Justice. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Saussure, Ferdinand de (1983 [1916]) Course in General Linguistics. LaSalle, IL: Open Court.
- Woolf, Virginia (1929) A Room of One's Own. London: Harcourt.
- Woolf, Virginia (1938) Three Guineas. New York: Harcourt, Inc.
Feminist Theory, Vol. 8, No. 3,
315-332 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1464700107082368
 CiteULike  Complore  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter What's this?
|
|
