Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Feminist Theory
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Adkins, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Social capital

The anatomy of a troubled concept

Lisa Adkins

University of Manchester, lisa.adkins{at}man.ac.uk

Within the social sciences the widespread impact of the social capital concept has prompted strong critique on the part of feminists, for it is a concept which appears to reinstate a version of social worlds which for the past thirty years or more feminist social scientists have sought to problematize and move beyond. Yet do these critiques go beyond the social capital paradigm? It is the contention of this article that they do not and in particular that such critiques fail to problematize the association of women with collective social goods found in the social capital literature. It will be suggested further that this association relates to the use of a dualism of instrumentality versus freedom, whereby women are overwhelmingly associated with the latter. This article therefore delineates a gendered subtext operative within the social capital debates. Recognition of this subtext should lead feminists to disengage with the social capital concept, for this is a concept whose use will always trap women in the social-historical time of industrial society.

Key Words: affective labour • Bourdieu • communication • economy • social capital

Feminist Theory, Vol. 6, No. 2, 195-211 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1464700105053694
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 YoungHome page
J. Holland
Young people and social capital: Uses and abuses?
Young, November 1, 2009; 17(4): 331 - 350.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Urban StudHome page
S. Weller and I. Bruegel
Children's `Place' in the Development of Neighbourhood Social Capital
Urban Stud, March 1, 2009; 46(3): 629 - 643.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Special EducationHome page
A. A. Trainor
Using Cultural and Social Capital to Improve Postsecondary Outcomes and Expand Transition Models for Youth With Disabilities
Journal of Special Education, November 1, 2008; 42(3): 148 - 162.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Feminist TheoryHome page
J. Franklin and R. Thomson
SPECIAL FEATURE: (Re)claiming the social: A conversation between feminist, late modern and social capital theories
Feminist Theory, August 1, 2005; 6(2): 161 - 172.
[Abstract] [PDF]