This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Hemmings, C. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Telling feminist stories

London School of Economics, C.Hemmings{at}lse.ac.uk

This article identifies and analyses the dominant stories that academics tell about the development of Western second wave feminist theory. Through an examination of recent production of interdisciplinary feminist and cultural theory journals, I suggest that despite a rhetorical insistence on multiple feminisms, Western feminist trajectories emerge as startlingly singular. In particular, I am critical of an insistent narrative that sees the development of feminist thought as a relentless march of progress or loss. This dominant approach oversimplifies the complex history of Western feminisms, fixes writers and perspectives within a particular decade, and repeatedly (and erroneously) positions poststructuralist feminists as ‘the first’ to challenge the category ‘woman’ as the subject and object of feminist knowledge. Rather than provide a corrective history of Western feminist theory, the article interrogates the techniques through which this dominant story is secured, despite the fact that we (feminist theorists) know better. My focus, therefore, is on citation patterns, discursive framings and some of their textual, theoretical and political effects. As an alternative, I suggest a realignment of key theorists purported to provide a critical break in feminist theory with their feminist citational traces, to force a concomitant re-imagining of our historical legacy and our place within it.

Key Words: loss • postmodernism • progress • the seventies • Western feminism

Feminist Theory, Vol. 6, No. 2, 115-139 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1464700105053690


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Roy Melancholic politics and the politics of melancholia: The Indian women's movement Feminist Theory, December 1, 2009; 10(3): 341 - 357. [Abstract] [PDF]

				V. Hesford The politics of love: Women's liberation and feeling differently Feminist Theory, April 1, 2009; 10(1): 5 - 33. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Glucksmann V. Airbrushing the History of Feminism: `Race' and Ethnicity Feminism Psychology, August 1, 2008; 18(3): 405 - 409. [PDF]

				R. Coleman `Things That Stay': Feminist theory, duration and the future Time Society, March 1, 2008; 17(1): 85 - 102. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Torr What's wrong with aspiring to find out what has really happened in academic feminism's recent past?: Response to Clare Hemmings' 'Telling feminist stories' Feminist Theory, April 1, 2007; 8(1): 59 - 67. [PDF]

				C. Hemmings What is a feminist theorist responsible for? Response to Rachel Torr Feminist Theory, April 1, 2007; 8(1): 69 - 76. [PDF]

				R. Holliday and J. S. Taylor Aesthetic surgery as false beauty Feminist Theory, August 1, 2006; 7(2): 179 - 195. [Abstract] [PDF]