| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Exposing the fallacies of anti-porn feminismCalifornia State Polytechnic University, ljshrage{at}csupomona.edu This paper examines an issue at the centre of feminist debates about pornography and sex work, and that is whether these practices reduce women to sex objects. I question the assumption that the expression of sexual desire is unique in its power to degrade and dehumanize persons. I show that this assumption underlies Catharine MacKinnons attack on pornography by considering MacKinnons intellectual debt to the philosopher Immanuel Kant. I then examine recent discussions of sexual objectification in the philosophical literature and argue that MacKinnons adaptation of Kant has flaws comparable to Kants original account of sexual desire.
Key Words: sexual objectification pornography MacKinnon sex work Kant
Feminist Theory, Vol. 6, No. 1,
45-65 (2005) |
|||